Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deal's Gone Bad (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. (non-admin closure) Unionhawk Talk E-mail 00:51, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Deal's Gone Bad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DELETE fails WP:MUSIC, and does so rather miserably. Lacks non-trivial coverage from reliably third party publications. JBsupreme (talk) 21:06, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Theleftorium 21:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Very Strong Keep Bad nomination in my book, considering the wealth of info out there and what was discussed in the first nom.
- "Four albums on Jump Up! Records[1], which seems to be a notable indie label specializing in ska and has an impressive list of other bands, including The Planet Smashers, Skarface, and The Slackers. Three of their albums are reviewed on allmusic.com."
- I'll add Punknews.org news [2], and international (Romanian!! Jurnalul Naţional) coverage: [3]. And here's a few pay-per-view articles that mention the band, their style, and tours from Google news: Chicago Tribune [4], Daily Herald (Arlington Heights) [5], and Sarasota Herald Tribune [6]. Rafablu88 22:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The nominator must not have read the previous AfD, or the talk page, on which multiple reliable sources were posted; Rafa's above only strengthen the deal. Meets WP:MUSIC. Chubbles (talk) 17:26, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.